Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Witch-Slapped 4

The societal definition of a "good man" has changed in several ways since the time of Macbeth. Furthermore I would argue that even the definition of a "manly man" has changed in some ways, like that soldiers are not longer glorified for their actual feats in battle (medals excluded) but for their service as a whole.


In modern times, a good man is judged less, or not at all, at his ability in battle, unlike in Macbeth when he is described in the second scene of act one as a ferocious warrior is praised for such. However, a mans ability to fight is still a part of his worth, but not as consciously judged. In modern times a man's strength is applied to his ability to fight and protect his woman, like correlating arm size to punching strength, and is much more speculative. In medieval times, a man's ability to fight was much more proven than estimated, such as in a duels, which (unfortunately) don't exist today. In addition to this, weapons can be attributed to manliness in both time periods. In the time of Macbeth, most men would know how to use a sword and carry one. Today, however, much fewer people believe that carrying weapons is sign of manliness, and also fewer people know how to use them.


Additionally, in today's society, the value of a man is placed much more on how he treats others at home and his success in life. While men are no longer considered the only providers in a family, I still think that society in general expects the man/husband in a relationship/marriage to have a respectable position and earn money for his family. Even in progressive times, it is still against societal conventions to be a stay at home dad, or even to have a "woman's job" such as a nurse. This is somewhat similar to Macbeth, as he is responsible for taking care of Lady Macbeth, but in those times the woman was not allowed to work. Also somewhat akin to that of old times, men are expected to do the dirty work. It isn't quite to the same extent that it was in Macbeth's time, where he had to be the one to kill Duncan, but men today are still expected to do yard work and construction opposed to women.

Lastly, one difference between the times in that now men aren't looked down upon for relying on their ladies for emotional support. Macbeth's own wife asked if he was a man when he began to freak out after killing Duncan, but nowadays a man can talk about his feelings to his significant other without being made fun of by that very own person.

Sunday, November 9, 2014

#IBViewingArt

View WP_20141109_002.jpg in slide showView WP_20141024_12_15_22_Pro.jpg in slide show


The artwork above on the right is called "Blind self portrait listening to the beetles while scratching a notched stick so to invoke, the universal magic of the power of destruction" by Abraham Cruzvillegas, and was created as an acrylic on paper medium in 2013.


The style is abstract, and is made in a modern period. The original location of the work is likely Mexico, as that is where the artist is from and no other information about the artist or the artwork was given.


The work represents the idea of "limited visibility" and does so by painting the back of several different papers and facing the unpainted side against the wall. Some of the 168 pieces included black and white pictures and letters (yes, I looked behind them when no one was looking) which seem to have no correlation other than their obscurity. The lack of information given to the viewer on the right side of the work supports the theme of limiting visibility and creating vagueness, as well as the abstract title.


The artist worked little with line or value, as the entire composition is one shade of tan and contains no shapes on the pieces of paper themselves. The forms are represented in a disorganized matter which adds to the confusion of the piece and its lack of traditional art principles. Furthermore the movement of the work doesn't have a clear direction and it lacks a central point of focus. Together, these techniques combine to create even more ambiguity to the already unclear concept of limited visibility, further emphasizing the artist's idea.


Overall, the purpose of the work is to open the viewer's mind to the unknown and inspire their curiosity and imagination as to what could be behind the paint. The piece worked well as an opening part of the museum's theme of limited visibility by being an outright example that started an artistic thought process and wasn't too difficult to digest. The piece is meant to create uncertainty as to what it means, as shown in the title and the work. The beetles could mean insects or the band, and it is up to the viewer to interpret everything based on a lack of stimuli.